News Updates

News Updates » Latest News Updates » Review of universitiesí reporting requirements recommends move to national information repository

Review of universitiesí reporting requirements recommends move to national information repository

4 April 2013

A review into the reporting requirements of universities has found potential opportunities for streamlining and the removal of duplications and overlaps.

The Review, which was commissioned by the LH Martin Institute and conducted by PhillipsKPA in August 2012, focused on universities’ reporting requirements to the Department of Industry, Innovation, Research, Science and Tertiary Education (DIISRTE), which currently conducts around 46 data collections from universities.

PhillipsKPA analysed the time spent and recurring costs involved in 18 of those data collections and found that, on average, Australian universities spent over 2000 working days and between $800,000 to $900,000 to gather the required information for these data sets. The costs range from a high of $30 for every $1,000 in funding to a minimum of around $0.2 for every $1000 in funding.

In addition to reports to DIISRTE Australian universities are also expected to provide information to the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA), the Australian Skills Quality Authority, state governments, the Department of Immigration and Citizenship and the Australian Research Council (ARC).

Despite their reporting burden, university representatives understand and accept the principles of accountability for public funding and recognise the legitimate interest of governments, the public and students in their activities. In addition, many university officials acknowledge the good practice implemented as a result of their various reporting requirements.

However, university representatives were unanimous that certain issues required reform.
Such as lack of coordination, tendency for reporting requirements to accumulate over time, problems of definition and documentation, frequent changes in the requirements and inadequate planning for these changes, and lack of access to useful and timely information.

David Phillips, Director of PhillipsKPA, believes that a more sophisticated model for governance and management of information is needed while acknowledging last year’s formation of the National Advisory Group on Data and Information to address these issues.

“The model should be centred around the development of a national higher education data collection and a national higher education information repository which would consolidate relevant data collecting activities and minimise the need for further collection outside of that model.

“The effort involved in one report is already very high. Multiply that by the number of different authorities which require submissions, then add more reports for grant applications and so on, you will start to see that there is a need to rationalise these data collections. But this will not happen without policy change.”

The Review also identified instances where DIISRTE could reduce reporting requirements. For instance, it found substantial opportunities to streamline Compacts and Institutional Performance Portfolios (IPPs), especially in relation to equity reporting.

A copy of the full report can be downloaded here [pdf].

More information:

Contact David Phillips (0412 080 614)
Email: DPhillips@phillipskpa.com.au
 

Bookmark and Share
What's Happening?
Budgeting & Financial Management for Tertiary Education Managers

Learn more about financial systems, tools and processes that are suitable for tertiary...

Emerging Leaders and Managers Program Workshops and Capstone Project

One-day, facilitated workshops for current, 2014 eLAMP participants to articulate into LH...

University Fee De-regulation: Markets, Strategy and Pricing - Discussion and Simulation Forum

The de-regulation of university fees from 2016 and changes to tuition subsidy rates and...

2014 Higher Education Policy Seminars

The 2014 Policy Seminars address contemporary debates, providing a forum for leaders from...

A conversation on comprehensive internationalisation with Prof John Hudzik

Increasingly, the business of universities is expanding across borders, and not just in...

Networking Events

We invite our alumni, program participants and collaborative partners to join us for a...

News Updates
21 October 2014
ATEM Bass Panel Discussion Event - The Changing Higher Education Workplace

The ATEM Bass Region are very pleased to announce our next panel discussion event - The...

20 October 2014
Submission to the Senate inquiry

Geoff Sharrock's submission to the Senate committee inquiry into government plans for...

17 October 2014
Million dollar degree payoffs: how real are they?

Writing in The Conversation, Geoff Sharrock finds that the graduate earnings premium is...

Insights Blog
20 October 2014
Invitation to Participate in a National Summit on Distributed Leadership in HE: Demonstrating Impact

The LH Martin Institute is co-sponsoring the first National Summit on Distributed...

30 September 2014
Communicating Graduate Research: A Presentation Overview

In response to a challenging policy environment and a reinvigoration of how to tell...

17 September 2014
Making Comprehensive Internationalisation work in the Australian Context

Are you a university leader or manager considering deep engagement with an overseas...

Research & Projects
Australian Institution Profiles

This project seeks to shift the discussion of institutional diversity in Australian...

Undergraduate Units Redesign at ACU and JCU

A project to improve student learning outcomes while reducing instructional costs at the...

Vocations

A three-year project funded by the National Centre for Vocational Education Research...